← All report cards · Registry

Built from public records and checked 2026-10-22. Not an audit of Lark. How scores are made · spotted a mistake? Tell us.
C
SaaS products high jurisdiction risk

Lark

Business chat, docs, meetings and calendar · Score 69/100 · Last checked 2026-10-22

The short version

Ask the vendor which company serves your region and where your data is stored. Its policy pages could not be read automatically.

Built from: public records, checked 2026-10-22.

Score breakdown

Security record83
Documented incidents and safeguards (public record, not a technical test)
Data jurisdiction28
Which laws and governments can reach your data
Ownership transparency72
How plainly the owner can be traced
Third-party exposure92
Documented analytics, advertising and attribution partners

Who owns it

Lark→Lark Technologies Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)→ByteDance Ltd.

Parent based in: 🇨🇳 China

Laws that can apply: PIPL, National Intelligence Law, Data Security Law

Where your data can go

The company does not name its data partners anywhere we could read automatically. That is a gap in the record, not a clean result.

Jurisdictions touched: 🇨🇳 China

What the public record says

mediumUS House told staff ByteDance apps, including Lark, would be removed from House devices

A July 2024 notice from the House Chief Administrative Officer named Lark among ByteDance products to be blocked and removed from House-managed devices. Source

Sources

Ownership, locations and data partners come from the company's own pages and filings where they exist. Last checked 2026-10-22.